New Page 1
 

COPD-X Menu
COPD-X Menu COPD-X Home Page COPD-X Guidelines Management Tools Case Statements News & Resources COPD Institute Contact Us
COPD-X Menu

 

C1. Aetiology and natural history

 
Smoking is the most important risk factor in the development of COPD8,9 [evidence level I]
 

Cigarette smoking is the most important cause of COPD.8,9 There is a close relationship between the amount of tobacco smoked and the rate of decline in forced expiratory flow in one second (FEV1 ), although individuals vary greatly in susceptibility.8 Around half of all smokers develop some airflow limitation, and 15%–20% will develop clinically significant disability.8 Smokers are also at risk of developing lung cancer, and cardiovascular disease such as ischaemic heart disease and peripheral vascular disease.

In susceptible smokers cigarette smoking results in a steady decline in lung function, with a decrease in FEV1 of 25–100 mL/year.8 While smoking cessation may lead to minimal improvements in lung function, more importantly it will slow the rate of decline in lung function and delay the onset of disablement. At all times smoking cessation is important to preserve remaining lung function.8

Impairment increases as the disease progresses, but may not be recognised because of the slow pace of the disease. The time course of development of COPD and disability and the influence of smoking cessation are illustrated in Box 3.

 

Box 3: Time-course of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)8

Time-course of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

The figure (adapted from Fletcher C and Peto R. The natural history of chronic airflow obstruction. BMJ 1977;1:1645-1648 and reproduced with permission from the BMJ Publishing Group) shows the rate of loss of forced expiratory flow in one second (FEV1) for a hypothetical, susceptible smoker, and the potential effect of stopping smoking early or late in the course of COPD. Other susceptible smokers will have different rates of loss, thus reaching “disability” at different ages. The normal FEV1 ranges from below 80% to above 120%, so this will affect the starting point for the individual’s data (not shown).

 

In addition to cigarette smoking, there are a number of other recognised risk factors for COPD10 (see Figure 3-1 below adapted from GOLD 2006). COPD almost always arises from a gene environment interaction. The best characterised genetic predisposition is alpha1 antitrypsin deficiency, but multiple other genes each make a small contribution and further investigation is required. The risk of COPD is related to the total burden of inhaled particles10 and oxidative stress in the lung. Occupational dust exposure might be responsible for 20 – 30% of COPD. This has long been recognised in underground miners, but recently biological dust has also been identified as a risk factor, particularly in women.11  Fortunately the air quality in most Australian cities is relatively good and cooking with biomass fuels (wood, dung etc) is uncommon. Failure to achieve maximum lung function increases the risk of COPD in later life. The role of gender is uncertain. Beyond the age of 45-50 years, female smokers appear to experience an accelerated decline in FEV1 compared with male smokers12 [evidence level II]. Nor is it known whether the increased risk among lower socioeconomic groups is due to greater exposure to pollution, poorer nutrition, more respiratory infection or other factors.10

 

Figure 3-1: Risk Factors for COPD10

Genes
Exposure to particles
Tobacco smoke
Occupational dusts, organic and inorganic
Indoor air pollution from heating and cooking with bio-mass in poorly vented dwellings
Outdoor air pollution
Lung Growth and Development
Oxidative stress
Gender
Age
Respiratory infections
Socioeconomic status
Nutrition
Comorbidities
Asthma

 

Although FEV1 has long been accepted as the single best predictor of mortality in population studies in COPD8,13 recent studies have suggested various other indices, which may also predict mortality. In patients with established COPD, degree of hyperinflation as measured by inspiratory capacity/ total lung capacity (IC/TLC) ratio was independently associated with all cause and COPD mortality.14 The 6 minute walk distance (6MWD), peak VO2 during a cardiopulmonary exercise test, body mass index and dyspnoea score (measured with the modified Medical Research Council Scale) have all been shown to predict mortality better than FEV1 in patients with established disease. Several of these latter indices incorporated together in a single score, the BODE index (BMI, degree of Obstruction as measured by FEV1, Dyspnoea score and Exercise capacity measured by 6 minute walk) strongly predicted mortality15.The single best predictor of mortality in COPD is FEV1. In one study the five-year survival rate was only about 10% for those with an FEV1 <20% predicted, 30% for those with FEV1 of 20%–29% predicted and about 50% for those with an FEV1 of 30%–39% predicted.  Continued smoking and airway hyperresponsiveness are associated with accelerated loss of lung function.16 However, even if substantial airflow limitation is present, cessation of smoking may result in some improvement in lung function and will slow progression of disease.16,17

The development of hypoxaemic respiratory failure is an independent predictor of mortality, with a three-year survival of about 40%.18 Long term administration of oxygen increases survival to about 50% with nocturnal oxygen18 and to about 60% with oxygen administration for more than 15 hours a day19 (see also section P).

Admission to hospital with an infective exacerbation of COPD complicated by hypercapnic respiratory failure is associated with a poor prognosis. A mortality of 11% during admission and 49% at two years has been reported in patients with a partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2) > 50 mmHg.20 For those with chronic carbon dioxide retention (about 25% of those admitted with hypercapnic exacerbations), the five-year survival was only 11%.20

Patients with an FEV1 <20% predicted and either homogeneous emphysema on HRCT or a DLCO <20% predicted are at high risk for death after LVRS and unlikely to benefit from the intervention.21

Next Page Previous Page